China, Taiwan Province of vs United Arab Emirates: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions

China, Taiwan Province of
0.554 kt
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
0.6458 kt
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
117th
United Arab Emirates rank
114th

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • United Arab Emirates
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.6458 kt against 0.554 kt in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 0.0918 kt.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.2 times China, Taiwan Province of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 117th and United Arab Emirates ranks 114th of 196 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 6 and United Arab Emirates in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3665 kt 0.0491 kt 0.3174 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 0.4108 kt 0.0624 kt 0.3484 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 0.5391 kt 0.1048 kt 0.4343 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 0.7063 kt 0.2075 kt 0.4988 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 0.6509 kt 0.3718 kt 0.2791 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 0.5701 kt 0.5597 kt 0.0104 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 0.5697 kt 0.6366 kt 0.0668 kt United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions, China, Taiwan Province of or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 0.6458 kt against 0.554 kt in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions between China, Taiwan Province of and United Arab Emirates?
0.0918 kt, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and United Arab Emirates?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and United Arab Emirates rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 117th and United Arab Emirates ranks 114th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs United Arab Emirates: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-taiwan-province-of/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-taiwan-province-of/united-arab-emirates/">China, Taiwan Province of vs United Arab Emirates: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf