Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions

Democratic Republic of the Congo
1.43 kt
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
2.33 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
12th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
11th

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Syrian Arab Republic
0.511.522.53196119922023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 2.33 kt against 1.43 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.9 kt.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.6 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th of 20 countries.

Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5528 kt 0.7957 kt 0.2429 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 0.7479 kt 0.9843 kt 0.2365 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1980s 0.8957 kt 1.6 kt 0.7082 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1990s 1.09 kt 1.82 kt 0.7317 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 0.9292 kt 2.26 kt 1.34 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 1.11 kt 2.18 kt 1.07 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 1.33 kt 2.18 kt 0.8524 kt Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 2.33 kt against 1.43 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.9 kt, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf