Central African Republic vs Zambia: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
148th
Zambia rank
151st

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Zambia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 148th and Zambia ranks 151st of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Zambia?
Central African Republic, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Zambia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Zambia rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 148th and Zambia ranks 151st of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Zambia: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zambia/">Central African Republic vs Zambia: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.