Costa Rica vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
45th
Cuba rank
48th

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Cuba
0000196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 45th and Cuba ranks 48th of 182 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Cuba?
Costa Rica, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Cuba?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Cuba rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 45th and Cuba ranks 48th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cuba/">Costa Rica vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.