Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Agrifood systems — Direct emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
626 kt
in 2023
Pakistan
175.32 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
12th
Pakistan rank
6th

Agrifood systems — Direct emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Pakistan
0200400600199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 626 kt against 175.32 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 450.68 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.6 times Pakistan's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 12th and Pakistan ranks 6th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 230.86 kt 76.03 kt 154.83 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 320.29 kt 103.54 kt 216.75 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 493.9 kt 136.27 kt 357.63 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 604.42 kt 166.83 kt 437.59 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems — direct emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Pakistan?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 626 kt against 175.32 kt in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems — direct emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
450.68 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for agrifood systems — direct emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 12th and Pakistan ranks 6th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Agrifood systems — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Agrifood systems — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood systems — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
249 places, 8,204 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf