Austria vs Libya: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Libya
How they compare
Austria currently reports 8,365 kt against 8,252 kt in Libya, a difference of 113 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 87th and Libya ranks 89th of 217 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,796 kt | 4,556 kt | 3,239 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | 9,697 kt | 6,628 kt | 3,070 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 8,708 kt | 6,641 kt | 2,066 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 8,463 kt | 8,167 kt | 295.35 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Austria or Libya?
- Austria, at 8,365 kt against 8,252 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Austria and Libya?
- 113 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Libya rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Austria ranks 87th and Libya ranks 89th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf