Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russia: Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
581,102 kt
in 2023
Russia
87,210 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
Russia rank
15th

Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Russia
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 581,102 kt against 87,210 kt in Russia, a difference of 493,892 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 6.7 times Russia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Russia ranks 15th of 33 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Russia Difference Ahead
1990s 301,402 kt 142,840 kt 158,562 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 361,063 kt 100,820 kt 260,243 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 498,188 kt 91,712 kt 406,476 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 573,766 kt 88,180 kt 485,586 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Russia?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 581,102 kt against 87,210 kt in Russia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russia?
493,892 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russia rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Russia ranks 15th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russia: Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russia: Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf