Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Lao People's Democratic Republic
11,425 kt
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
7,876 kt
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
12th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
13th

Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Syrian Arab Republic
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020062023

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 11,425 kt against 7,876 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 3,549 kt.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.5 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 12th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 13th of 22 countries.

Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 6,706 kt 5,683 kt 1,022 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
2000s 7,361 kt 7,335 kt 26.47 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s 8,892 kt 7,593 kt 1,300 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 10,172 kt 7,638 kt 2,534 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Syrian Arab Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 11,425 kt against 7,876 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Syrian Arab Republic?
3,549 kt, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Syrian Arab Republic?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 12th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 13th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood systems — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf