Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mayotte: Agrifood systems — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0 kt
in 2023
Mayotte
0 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
211th
Mayotte rank
211th

Agrifood systems — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Mayotte
0000.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mayotte, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mayotte ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 211th and Mayotte ranks 211th of 222 countries.

Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Mayotte Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0005 kt Mayotte
2000s 0 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0006 kt Mayotte
2010s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt Mayotte
2020s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Mayotte?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mayotte as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mayotte?
0 kt, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mayotte?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mayotte rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 211th and Mayotte ranks 211th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mayotte: Agrifood systems — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/mayotte/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/mayotte/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mayotte: Agrifood systems — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf