Laos vs Zimbabwe: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Laos currently reports 17.8 kt against 17.55 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.25 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Laos ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 257 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.15 kt | 16.93 kt | 9.78 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 8.71 kt | 17.1 kt | 8.39 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 11.05 kt | 16.77 kt | 5.72 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 13.83 kt | 16.84 kt | 3.01 kt | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Laos, at 17.8 kt against 17.55 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 0.25 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Laos ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf