Chad vs Lithuania: Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Chad
0 kt per person
in 2023
Lithuania
0 kt per person
in 2023
Chad rank
9th
Lithuania rank
12th
Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Chad
- Lithuania
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 201 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Chad |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Chad |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Chad |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions (n2o), per capita, Chad or Lithuania?
- Chad, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions (n2o), per capita between Chad and Lithuania?
- 0 kt per person, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Lithuania rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Chad ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.