Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agrifood systems — Emissions Share

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
80.59 %
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
123.09 %
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
1st
Syrian Arab Republic rank
3rd

Agrifood systems — Emissions Share over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Syrian Arab Republic
255075100125199020062023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 123.09 % against 80.59 % in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 42.5 %.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.5 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 3rd of 12 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 82.8 % 18.42 % 64.38 % Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 81.55 % 36.1 % 45.45 % Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 81.17 % 75.87 % 5.3 % Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 81.33 % 116.94 % 35.61 % Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions share, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 123.09 % against 80.59 % in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions share between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Syrian Arab Republic?
42.5 %, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Syrian Arab Republic?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions share?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 3rd of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agrifood systems — Emissions Share. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-share-ch4/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-share-ch4/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Syrian Arab Republic: Agrifood systems — Emissions Share</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood systems — Emissions Share (CH4)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,018 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.