Belgium-Luxembourg vs Kuwait: Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Kuwait
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 1,807 kt against 1,733 kt in Kuwait, a difference of 74 kt.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 81st and Kuwait ranks 82nd of 215 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Belgium-Luxembourg or Kuwait?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 1,807 kt against 1,733 kt in Kuwait as of 1999.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Belgium-Luxembourg and Kuwait?
- 74 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Kuwait?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Kuwait rank globally for agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 81st and Kuwait ranks 82nd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf