Costa Rica vs Sierra Leone: Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions

Costa Rica
0.145 kt
in 2023
Sierra Leone
0.1557 kt
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
121st
Sierra Leone rank
118th

Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Sierra Leone
00.050.10.15199020062023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0.1557 kt against 0.145 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0107 kt.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 121st and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0827 kt 0.0649 kt 0.0178 kt Costa Rica
2000s 0.106 kt 0.0917 kt 0.0143 kt Costa Rica
2010s 0.127 kt 0.1298 kt 0.0028 kt Sierra Leone
2020s 0.1441 kt 0.152 kt 0.0079 kt Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions, Costa Rica or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 0.1557 kt against 0.145 kt in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions between Costa Rica and Sierra Leone?
0.0107 kt, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sierra Leone?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Sierra Leone rank globally for agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions?
Costa Rica ranks 121st and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Sierra Leone: Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-waste-disposal-emissions-n2o/costa-rica/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-waste-disposal-emissions-n2o/costa-rica/sierra-leone/">Costa Rica vs Sierra Leone: Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
257 places, 8,503 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.