Ecuador vs Sudan: All Crops — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per
Ecuador
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Ecuador rank
74th
Sudan rank
75th
All Crops — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per over time
- Ecuador
- Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 74th and Sudan ranks 75th of 160 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all crops — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Ecuador or Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all crops — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Ecuador and Sudan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for all crops — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
- Ecuador ranks 74th and Sudan ranks 75th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as All Crops — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
All Crops — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.