Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): All Crops — Burning crop residues
All Crops — Burning crop residues over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 2.83 kt against 0.4651 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2.36 kt.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 65 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2408 kt | 1 kt | 0.7629 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 0.2667 kt | 1.15 kt | 0.8823 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 0.3322 kt | 1.28 kt | 0.9446 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 0.2864 kt | 1.54 kt | 1.25 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.3763 kt | 1.94 kt | 1.56 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 0.3743 kt | 2.56 kt | 2.19 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 0.3607 kt | 2.9 kt | 2.54 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2030s | 0.4575 kt | 2.47 kt | 2.01 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2050s | 0.4651 kt | 2.83 kt | 2.37 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all crops — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 2.83 kt against 0.4651 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
- What is the difference in all crops — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 2.36 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for all crops — burning crop residues?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Crops — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).