Cuba vs Malta: All Crops — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Cuba
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
111th
Malta rank
113th

All Crops — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Malta
000000196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Cuba ranks 111th and Malta ranks 113th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all crops — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Cuba or Malta?
Cuba, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in all crops — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Cuba and Malta?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for all crops — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 111th and Malta ranks 113th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Crops — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Malta: All Crops — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-crops-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-crops-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malta/">Cuba vs Malta: All Crops — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Crops — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,310 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Crops — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.