Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Crops — Crop residues

Syrian Arab Republic
0.5377 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
0.7582 kt
in 2050
Syrian Arab Republic rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

All Crops — Crop residues over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.20.40.60.8196120052050

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.7582 kt against 0.5377 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.2205 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 20 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0947 kt 0.0712 kt 0.0235 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 0.1152 kt 0.1186 kt 0.0035 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 0.1642 kt 0.1838 kt 0.0196 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 0.248 kt 0.2141 kt 0.0339 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 0.2573 kt 0.3019 kt 0.0446 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0.1999 kt 0.4816 kt 0.2817 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.1951 kt 0.5797 kt 0.3846 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2030s 0.404 kt 0.525 kt 0.121 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2050s 0.5377 kt 0.7582 kt 0.2205 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all crops — crop residues, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.7582 kt against 0.5377 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in all crops — crop residues between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.2205 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for all crops — crop residues?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Crops — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-crops-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-crops-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Crops — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
236 places, 13,782 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).