Ecuador vs Sweden: All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
79th
Sweden rank
77th

All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sweden
000196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Ecuador ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 77th of 163 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all crops — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square, Ecuador or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in all crops — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square between Ecuador and Sweden?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for all crops — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square?
Ecuador ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 77th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sweden: All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-crops-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-crops-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sweden/">Ecuador vs Sweden: All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,310 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Crops — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.