South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: All Crops — Crops total (Emissions CH4)
All Crops — Crops total (Emissions CH4) over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4.93 kt against 4.66 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0.27 kt.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
South Sudan ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.22 kt | 3.47 kt | 1.25 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4.81 kt | 2.94 kt | 1.87 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all crops — crops total, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4.93 kt against 4.66 kt in South Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in all crops — crops total between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.27 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for all crops — crops total?
- South Sudan ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Crops — Crops total (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).