Aruba vs South Sudan: All Crops — Crops total (Emissions N2O)
All Crops — Crops total (Emissions N2O) over time
- Aruba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 192nd and South Sudan ranks 192nd of 199 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0005 kt | 0.3071 kt | 0.3066 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.3318 kt | 0.3317 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all crops — crops total, Aruba or South Sudan?
- Aruba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all crops — crops total between Aruba and South Sudan?
- 0 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and South Sudan rank globally for all crops — crops total?
- Aruba ranks 192nd and South Sudan ranks 192nd of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Crops — Crops total (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).