Mayotte vs Reunion: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mayotte
- Reunion
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Reunion, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Reunion has been ahead every year.
Mayotte ranks 236th and Reunion ranks 236th of 257 countries.
Reunion has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Reunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0021 kt | 1.64 kt | 1.64 kt | Reunion |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 1.47 kt | 1.47 kt | Reunion |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0112 kt | 0.0112 kt | Reunion |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions, Mayotte or Reunion?
- Mayotte, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Reunion as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions between Mayotte and Reunion?
- 0 kt, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Reunion?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mayotte and Reunion rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions?
- Mayotte ranks 236th and Reunion ranks 236th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf