Myanmar vs Sudan: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CH4)
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Myanmar
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2,430 kt against 2,319 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 111 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 34th and Sudan ranks 33rd of 257 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,735 kt | 2,340 kt | 395.37 kt | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 2,388 kt | 2,424 kt | 35.59 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions, Myanmar or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2,430 kt against 2,319 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions between Myanmar and Sudan?
- 111 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Sudan rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions?
- Myanmar ranks 34th and Sudan ranks 33rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf