Belgium-Luxembourg vs Ireland: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 17,716 kt against 15,770 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 1,946 kt.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 79th and Ireland ranks 76th of 222 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Belgium-Luxembourg or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 17,716 kt against 15,770 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Belgium-Luxembourg and Ireland?
- 1,946 kt, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Ireland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Ireland rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 79th and Ireland ranks 76th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf