Central African Republic vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Central African Republic
18,976 kt
in 2023
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
19,274 kt
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
73rd
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
72nd

All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 19,274 kt against 18,976 kt in Central African Republic, a difference of 298 kt.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 73rd and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 72nd of 222 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1990s 18,797 kt 34,968 kt 16,171 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2000s 22,668 kt 25,290 kt 2,622 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 23,491 kt 22,087 kt 1,404 kt Central African Republic
2020s 22,194 kt 19,643 kt 2,551 kt Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Central African Republic or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 19,274 kt against 18,976 kt in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Central African Republic and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
298 kt, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Central African Republic ranks 73rd and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 72nd of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Central African Republic vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf