Gibraltar vs Tokelau: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O)
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Tokelau
-20 % change on previous year
in 2023
Gibraltar rank
241st
Tokelau rank
238th
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O) over time
- Gibraltar
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports -20 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Gibraltar, a difference of 80 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 241st and Tokelau ranks 238th of 244 countries.
Tokelau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Gibraltar or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at -20 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Gibraltar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Gibraltar and Tokelau?
- 80 % change on previous year, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Tokelau?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Gibraltar and Tokelau rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Gibraltar ranks 241st and Tokelau ranks 238th of 244 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.