Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita, Congo or Cuba?

Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.

What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita between Congo and Cuba?

0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cuba?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Cuba: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O)

Congo

0 kt per person

in 2023

Cuba

0 kt per person

in 2023

Congo rank

98th

Cuba rank

95th

All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O) over time

Congo
Cuba

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 98th and Cuba ranks 95th of 201 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Cuba	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita, Congo or Cuba?: Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita between Congo and Cuba?: 0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cuba?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Cuba rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita?: Congo ranks 98th and Cuba ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Cuba: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-capita/congo-rep/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-capita/congo-rep/cuba/">Congo vs Cuba: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,753 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 11 October 2026

All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.