Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors without LULUCF — Direct emissions

Australia
129.39 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
626 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
10th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
12th

All sectors without LULUCF — Direct emissions over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0200400600199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 626 kt against 129.39 kt in Australia, a difference of 496.61 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.8 times Australia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 10th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 12th of 197 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 110.04 kt 230.86 kt 120.82 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 108.08 kt 320.29 kt 212.21 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 106.06 kt 493.9 kt 387.84 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 115.29 kt 604.42 kt 489.13 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — direct emissions, Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 626 kt against 129.39 kt in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — direct emissions between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
496.61 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — direct emissions?
Australia ranks 10th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 12th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors without LULUCF — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors without LULUCF — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
249 places, 8,204 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf