Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Holy See: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.042 kt
in 2023
Holy See
0.0052 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
201st
Holy See rank
202nd

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Holy See
0.010.020.030.04199020062023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.042 kt against 0.0052 kt in Holy See, a difference of 0.0368 kt.

That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 8.1 times Holy See's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 201st and Holy See ranks 202nd of 222 countries.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Holy See Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0242 kt 0.0136 kt 0.0106 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2000s 0.0319 kt 0.0123 kt 0.0196 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 0.0363 kt 0.008 kt 0.0282 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 0.0411 kt 0.0057 kt 0.0354 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Holy See?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.042 kt against 0.0052 kt in Holy See as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Holy See?
0.0368 kt, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Holy See?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Holy See rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 201st and Holy See ranks 202nd of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Holy See: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/holy-see/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/holy-see/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Holy See: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf