Chad vs Sudan: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CH4)
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Chad
- Sudan
How they compare
Chad currently reports 2,603 kt against 2,429 kt in Sudan, a difference of 174 kt.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Chad ranks 31st and Sudan ranks 32nd of 257 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,773 kt | 2,340 kt | 566.74 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 2,408 kt | 2,424 kt | 15.28 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions, Chad or Sudan?
- Chad, at 2,603 kt against 2,429 kt in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions between Chad and Sudan?
- 174 kt, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Sudan rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions?
- Chad ranks 31st and Sudan ranks 32nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf