Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors without LULUCF … CH4 CO2eq annual growth rate
All sectors without LULUCF … CH4 CO2eq annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 26.92 % change on previous year against 2.51 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 24.41 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 10.7 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 242 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6115 % change on previous year | 9.14 % change on previous year | 8.52 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2000s | -0.6497 % change on previous year | 2.99 % change on previous year | 3.64 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 0.8009 % change on previous year | 3.21 % change on previous year | 2.41 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 4.7 % change on previous year | 1.88 % change on previous year | 2.82 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), annual, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 26.92 % change on previous year against 2.51 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), annual between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 24.41 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), annual?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 242 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.