Afghanistan vs Belgium-Luxembourg: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Afghanistan
- Belgium-Luxembourg
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 16,278 kt against 15,770 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 508 kt.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 77th and Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 78th of 222 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Afghanistan or Belgium-Luxembourg?
- Afghanistan, at 16,278 kt against 15,770 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Afghanistan and Belgium-Luxembourg?
- 508 kt, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Belgium-Luxembourg?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Afghanistan and Belgium-Luxembourg rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Afghanistan ranks 77th and Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 78th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf