Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mongolia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
48,751 kt
in 2023
Mongolia
45,042 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
42nd
Mongolia rank
45th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Mongolia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 48,751 kt against 45,042 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 3,709 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 45th of 257 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 24,764 kt 11,165 kt 13,599 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 28,196 kt 11,931 kt 16,265 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 40,118 kt 27,916 kt 12,202 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 47,832 kt 36,906 kt 10,927 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Mongolia?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 48,751 kt against 45,042 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mongolia?
3,709 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mongolia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mongolia rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 45th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mongolia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/mongolia/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mongolia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf