How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Namibia: All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 … capita CH4

Congo

0.0025 kt per person

in 2023

Namibia

0.0022 kt per person

in 2023

Congo rank

27th

Namibia rank

30th

All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 … capita CH4 over time

Congo
Namibia

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0025 kt per person against 0.0022 kt per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.0003 kt per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 30th of 201 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0038 kt per person	0.0031 kt per person	0.0007 kt per person	Congo
2000s	0.0038 kt per person	0.0028 kt per person	0.0009 kt per person	Congo
2010s	0.0031 kt per person	0.0026 kt per person	0.0004 kt per person	Congo
2020s	0.0026 kt per person	0.0022 kt per person	0.0004 kt per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per, Congo or Namibia?: Congo, at 0.0025 kt per person against 0.0022 kt per person in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per between Congo and Namibia?: 0.0003 kt per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per?: Congo ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,753 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.