How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Serbia: All sectors without LULUCF … CH4 CO2eq square kilometre

Burkina Faso

0.0785 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

0.0777 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

96th

Serbia rank

97th

All sectors without LULUCF … CH4 CO2eq square kilometre over time

Burkina Faso
Serbia

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0785 kt per square kilometre against 0.0777 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0008 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 96th and Serbia ranks 97th of 201 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0599 kt per square kilometre	0.0903 kt per square kilometre	0.0304 kt per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.0707 kt per square kilometre	0.0834 kt per square kilometre	0.0127 kt per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	0.0744 kt per square kilometre	0.083 kt per square kilometre	0.0086 kt per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per, Burkina Faso or Serbia?: Burkina Faso, at 0.0785 kt per square kilometre against 0.0777 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per between Burkina Faso and Serbia?: 0.0008 kt per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Serbia rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per?: Burkina Faso ranks 96th and Serbia ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Serbia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/serbia/">Burkina Faso vs Serbia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.