How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Montenegro: All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … CH4 square kilometre

Congo

0.0452 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Montenegro

0.0452 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo rank

137th

Montenegro rank

136th

All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … CH4 square kilometre over time

Congo
Montenegro

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.0452 kt per square kilometre against 0.0452 kt per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Congo ranks 137th and Montenegro ranks 136th of 201 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Montenegro	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.043 kt per square kilometre	0.0525 kt per square kilometre	0.0094 kt per square kilometre	Montenegro
2010s	0.045 kt per square kilometre	0.05 kt per square kilometre	0.0049 kt per square kilometre	Montenegro
2020s	0.0458 kt per square kilometre	0.0465 kt per square kilometre	0.0007 kt per square kilometre	Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per, Congo or Montenegro?: Montenegro, at 0.0452 kt per square kilometre against 0.0452 kt per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per between Congo and Montenegro?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per?: Congo ranks 137th and Montenegro ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Montenegro: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/montenegro/">Congo vs Montenegro: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.