How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Eswatini: All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … CO2eq unit GDP N2O

Congo

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Eswatini

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Congo rank

52nd

Eswatini rank

53rd

All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … CO2eq unit GDP N2O over time

Congo
Eswatini

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.

Congo ranks 52nd and Eswatini ranks 53rd of 198 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Congo
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Congo
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Congo
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per, Congo or Eswatini?: Congo, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per between Congo and Eswatini?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per?: Congo ranks 52nd and Eswatini ranks 53rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 200 places, 6,527 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.