Belgium-Luxembourg vs Burkina Faso: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 38.19 kt against 34 kt in Burkina Faso, a difference of 4.19 kt.
That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 48th and Burkina Faso ranks 51st of 222 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions, Belgium-Luxembourg or Burkina Faso?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 38.19 kt against 34 kt in Burkina Faso as of 1999.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions between Belgium-Luxembourg and Burkina Faso?
- 4.19 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Burkina Faso?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Burkina Faso rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 48th and Burkina Faso ranks 51st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf