Congo vs Montenegro: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O)
Congo
0 kt per person
in 2023
Montenegro
0 kt per person
in 2023
Congo rank
105th
Montenegro rank
102nd
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O) over time
- Congo
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 105th and Montenegro ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita, Congo or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita between Congo and Montenegro?
- 0 kt per person, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Congo ranks 105th and Montenegro ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.