How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Guatemala?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Guatemala: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Aruba

0.0002 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Guatemala

0.0002 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Aruba rank

50th

Guatemala rank

47th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

Aruba
Guatemala

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.

Aruba ranks 50th and Guatemala ranks 47th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Guatemala	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Aruba
2000s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Aruba
2010s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Guatemala
2020s	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Aruba or Guatemala?: Guatemala, at 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Aruba and Guatemala?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Guatemala?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Guatemala rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?: Aruba ranks 50th and Guatemala ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Guatemala: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/aruba/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/aruba/guatemala/">Aruba vs Guatemala: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.