Aruba vs New Zealand: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Aruba
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
50th
New Zealand rank
48th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • New Zealand
00000199020062023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 50th and New Zealand ranks 48th of 201 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Aruba or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Aruba and New Zealand?
0 kt per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Aruba and New Zealand rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 50th and New Zealand ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs New Zealand: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/aruba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/aruba/new-zealand/">Aruba vs New Zealand: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.