How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Latvia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso

0.0001 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

0.0001 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

78th

Latvia rank

75th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

Burkina Faso
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 201 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Latvia?: Latvia, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Latvia?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?: Burkina Faso ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Latvia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/latvia/">Burkina Faso vs Latvia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.