Ecuador vs South Africa: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
136th
South Africa rank
135th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
00000199020062023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 136th and South Africa ranks 135th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and South Africa?
0 kt per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 136th and South Africa ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.