Iceland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Iceland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
184th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
187th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0000199020062023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 184th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 187th of 201 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Iceland or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Iceland, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 184th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/iceland/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/iceland/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Iceland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.