Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Malta
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
8th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
5th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Trinidad and Tobago
000.0010.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0005 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 2.1 times Malta's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 8th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 5th of 201 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Malta or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0005 kt per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Trinidad and Tobago?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Malta and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 8th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 5th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/malta/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malta vs Trinidad and Tobago: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.