How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Sweden

0.0001 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0001 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Sweden rank

141st

Zimbabwe rank

142nd

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

Sweden
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sweden	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Sweden
2020s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Sweden or Zimbabwe?: Sweden, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Sweden and Zimbabwe?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?: Sweden ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.