Angola vs Chile: All sectors without LULUCF β Emissions Share
Angola
89.17 %
in 2023
Chile
95.4 %
in 2023
Angola rank
201st
Chile rank
198th
All sectors without LULUCF β Emissions Share over time
- Angola
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 95.4 % against 89.17 % in Angola, a difference of 6.23 %.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 201st and Chile ranks 198th of 209 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78.83 % | 99.33 % | 20.5 % | Chile |
| 2000s | 86.07 % | 99.68 % | 13.61 % | Chile |
| 2010s | 84.47 % | 99.21 % | 14.74 % | Chile |
| 2020s | 87.4 % | 98.38 % | 10.98 % | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf β emissions share, Angola or Chile?
- Chile, at 95.4 % against 89.17 % in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf β emissions share between Angola and Chile?
- 6.23 %, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chile?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Chile rank globally for all sectors without lulucf β emissions share?
- Angola ranks 201st and Chile ranks 198th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF β Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.