Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Botswana: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
100 %
in 2023
Botswana
100 %
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
1st
Botswana rank
1st

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Botswana
020406080100199020062023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Botswana, a difference of 0 %.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 192 countries.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 100 % 98.53 % 1.47 % Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2000s 100 % 99.91 % 0.086 % Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 100 % 100 % 0.005 % Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 100 % 100 % 0.0025 % Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Botswana?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 100 % against 100 % in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Botswana?
0 %, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Botswana?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Botswana rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Botswana: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-ch4/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-ch4/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/botswana/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Botswana: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,018 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.