Botswana vs Nauru: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share
Botswana
100 %
in 2023
Nauru
100 %
in 2023
Botswana rank
1st
Nauru rank
1st
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Botswana
- Nauru
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Nauru, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 209 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98.53 % | 100 % | 1.47 % | Nauru |
| 2000s | 99.91 % | 100 % | 0.086 % | Nauru |
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 0.005 % | Nauru |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 0.0025 % | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share, Botswana or Nauru?
- Botswana, at 100 % against 100 % in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share between Botswana and Nauru?
- 0 %, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Nauru?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Nauru rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
- Botswana ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.