Brazil vs Congo: All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share

Brazil
99.06 %
in 2023
Congo
99.01 %
in 2023
Brazil rank
178th
Congo rank
179th

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share over time

  • Brazil
  • Congo
020406080100199020062023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 99.06 % against 99.01 % in Congo, a difference of 0.05 %.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 178th and Congo ranks 179th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 97.29 % 97.44 % 0.146 % Congo
2000s 98.53 % 98.81 % 0.282 % Congo
2010s 98.84 % 98.72 % 0.123 % Brazil
2020s 98.7 % 98.79 % 0.0925 % Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share, Brazil or Congo?
Brazil, at 99.06 % against 99.01 % in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share between Brazil and Congo?
0.05 %, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share?
Brazil ranks 178th and Congo ranks 179th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CH4)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,018 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.